A Mathematical Essay on Sexuality

After all, where does sexuality come from? Genetics explains everything about sexuality. Religions also have their version. Here we present our version. Amazing, using math!

Modern mathematics emerged with the advent of set theory. But before that, algebra fertilized analytic geometry. And so speaking, let’s use a little of this to build a (new) idea.

We can, initially, establish a first axiom: whether L is a non-numerical, non-ordered set, or entropic in the sense of disorder, such a set will be characterized in such a way that each component of L will be represented by a superimposed construction of three basic factors; seed(s), environment (E) and an operator (*), so we can represent this in the form:

We then say s superimposed on E generates L dominant environment or L dominant seed.

• We adopted this expression above inspired by chemistry which works with the chemical reaction nomenclature in the form of products (L) and reagents (s, E).
• the superscripts on the right side of the expression are not exponents, they are descriptive indices. The one that is superscripted will be a dominant factor
• the union set symbol exists to express the idea that the product results in two possibilities.

We can represent the set L in enumerated form:

where each l will represent an individualized element, that is, an individual. So we can write:

or, generalizing

To complete the structure of the set L, let’s define the algebraic product that will make us have a numerical group in the mathematical sense.

Let’s assume that two individuals M and N are randomly chosen, so when they are chosen they will produce entropy as an axiomatic rule and this will be evidenced by means of the product generated by the operator * on the characteristic of the reactants (s, E) of each individual of the chosen pair.

1. if the dominant in M ​​is of type s, and the dominant in N is also of type s then the entropy will be weak and the product will be a zero element.
2. if the dominant in M ​​is of type s and the dominant in N is of type E then there will be a result through the operation s*E.
3. if the dominant in M ​​is of type E and the dominant in N is of type s then there will be a result through the operation s*E, in this case it is said that the result is an overcoming. Therefore, the operation s*E is not commutative, that is, E*s is not defined as valid.
4. if the dominant in M ​​is of type E, and the dominant in N is also of type E then the entropy will be weak and the product will be a zero element.

With this model it is possible to model any reproductive biological process that is sexual.

Note that, in summary, the model assumes that both the s part and the E part coexist somatically and possibly psychically overlapping in a biological individual.